Posted On: February 22, 2011 by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.

Maryland Appellate Opinions

The last five opinions from Maryland's appellate courts:

  • Wasserman v. Kay: commercial case involving Bernie Madoff victims
  • Matthews v. State: I love this line from this case: "What seems at first to be a legal problem frequently turns out to be a linguistic or a semantic problem. On this appeal, we come face to face with the enigma that an illegal sentence is not always an illegal sentence. We do not mean this as doubletalk. "
  • Kenan Cappel v. Riaso: confessed judgment case
  • Bonfiglio v. Fitzgerald: domestic case involving a QDRO. I knew what a QDRO was before the bar, I think. Now, I have no clue.
  • Muti v. University of Maryland Medical System: medical malpractice wrongful death case involving use plaintiffs.


Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)