It is tough job market for new lawyers. But law students and young lawyers should keep in mind that the legal market has had peeks and valleys as long as anyone can remember. The market is going to change again and people scrambling for jobs are going to have their pick of good jobs. It is just hard to imagine right now if you have never seen the highs and lows.

Related Information

• Sample Motions
• Sample Trial Transcripts
• Sample Discovery

The Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided this week in Benway v. Maryland Port Administration where a pro se Plaintiff raised an interesting yet still useless question: Is it error to rule on a summary judgment motion filed after the scheduling order deadline?

The question is interesting because the current version of Maryland Rule 2-501 does not contain the phrase, “file at any time,” because amendments to the Rule in 2004 took the language out in light of the nearly universal use of scheduling orders. But, the question is ultimately just an academic exercise because if you win on "the motion was filed late" argument, you are still going to lose a directed verdict because the evidence never comes out better than "most favorable to the Plaintiff." So Plaintiff's winning this motion is only a temporary stay of execution.

Plaintiff had what I thought was a tough case at trial because Illinois law sets a high bar for "contact" participant sport injuries, requiring willful or wanton conduct which is certainly a tougher standard than ordinary negligence.

I have always disliked this judicially created exception to the usual "reasonable person" standard in Illinois so I'm a glad to see that this incredibly sympathetic plaintiff was able to get a meaningful recovery.

• What to Do Just Before Taking the Bar (advice)
• Maryland Bar Results for July 2009
• Maryland Bar Examiners Website
• Last July's Results

For mainstream Catholics, this is one of the few ways we have to publicly celebrate our faith. Many faiths of the world have ways you can, for lack of a better phrase, wear your religion on your sleeve at trial. Jewish lawyers have yarmulkes, female Muslim lawyers have headscarfs, some Sikh attorneys have turbans, etc. Would a judge every ask any of these people to remove their religious garb? Of course not. Yet, in this case, the judge asked the prosecutor to remove his ashes. The prosecutor removed the ashes and the trial continued.

Do I think this was unfair? Yes. But the judge was in a no-win situation. It would also be unfair the state of Iowa to piggyback off of the prosecutor's show of piety because religious faith does influence jurors. (If you have any doubt about this, read the section on religion in David Ball and Don Keenan's book Damages.) So, on balance, I think the judge did the right thing and picked the integrity of a serious criminal trial over the prosecutor's expression of faith. Still, I don't like it.

This is one of those situations where you would really hate to be a judge.

Houghton observed a drug sale on North Eutaw Street in Baltimore City through a security camera feed. Three persons participated in the sale: the drug dealer, a male purchaser, and an alleged female purchaser who was wearing a white shirt or coat. As the transaction was being completed, Houghton contacted an arresting team, comprising Officer Timothy Williams and another officer, and instructed them to arrest the participants in the sale. The arresting team took the dealer and the male purchaser into custody, finding drugs on each of them, but the alleged female purchaser had left the scene. Houghton then witnessed, through the video feed, the alleged female purchaser embrace a second woman nearby. Houghton assumed that the embrace concealed the transfer or sale of drugs from the female purchaser to the second woman. This second woman was wearing a black jacket, dark jeans, and carrying a red umbrella. Houghton moved the camera back to the arrest, and in doing so, lost sight of the second woman.

After monitoring the arrest, Houghton scanned the area for the female purchaser and the second woman. The female purchaser was no longer in view, but Houghton could see someone whom he believed to be the second woman. In fact, the person in Houghton’s view was Forrest, who was standing some distance away at a nearby bus stop. Forrest was wearing different colored pants and jacket than the second woman, though both were carrying red umbrellas. Houghton instructed Williams to arrest Forrest. Williams approached Forrest, and asked if she had “anything illegal” on her person; Forrest said she did not, and consented to a search of her person. The search revealed no contraband, but Houghton nonetheless instructed Williams to arrest Forrest. Williams suggested that Houghton review the video footage to make certain that Forrest was indeed the second woman. Houghton did not do so, but nonetheless confirmed that Forrest was to be arrested. Williams handcuffed and arrested Forrest, over Forrest’s protests, and placed her with the other arrestees. Forrest testified at trial that she overheard Williams discussing the possibility that he may have arrested the wrong person, and that Williams was instructed to take her into custody nonetheless. Forrest was moved to Central Booking, though she was not summoned to court and charges against her were eventually dismissed.

The jury awarded $171.60 in actual damages, $180,000.00 in compensatory damages, and no punitive damages.

Plaintiff in this case was put in just an awful situation. Can you imagine how you would feel? Still, I can't help but wonder about how long her pain and suffering was in this case. I have clients who are in physical pain every day of their lives and have accumulated large medical bills and get a similar recovery.

I'm not condemning this verdict and it is worth nothing that everything I know about this case is quoted in the facts above. You have to sit on a jury to know what you think the real value of the case is. It seems overwhelmingly likely that the jury really liked the Plaintiff and did not like the police officer. All I'm saying is that my greatest sympathies clearly lean towards people whose lives have been changed forever from physical injury.

You can read the full opinion here.

Lord & Whip's slogan is "A Century's Perspective: A Modern Approach." No matter how good of a lawyer the last remaining partner may be, it might be a good idea to pull this sign down if he is under 130 years-old.

I've probably reported on this story so much because Lord & Whip was involved in one of our first big wrongful death cases when we started this law firm. Lord & Whip had nice offices - albeit in Charles Center South on 36 Charles Place, a building I have never particularly liked, mostly because I don't like the elevators. Lord & Whip seemed like a good firm, they had a good reputation and seemed to run professional shop. If you had told me then that they would have one partner in 2010, I would have said you are crazy. I guess this is life as a lawyer for many in this new legal economy.

• Lord & Whip Partnership Fight Settles
• December Lord & Whip Defection News
• Original Story of Lord & Whip Legal Battle Among Partners

I really can't think of a dumber lawsuit. Couldn't these victims just get off Facebook?

What is interesting is that substantially the same case was tried in front of the same judge in September and a mistrial was granted because the jury was deadlocked. It is amazing how two different jury panels can see the same case so differently.

The plaintiffs' law firm is one I associate with defense work: Kerr McDonald. Walmart's lawyer was the highly regarded - on both sides of the v - Christopher R. Dunn, with DeCaro, Doran, Siciliano, Gallagher & DeBlasis.

This is just a depression awful story follow-up story of a more depressing and more awful story.

The lawsuit had made some pretty interesting charges about how Lord & Whip broke up. Lord & Whip may still be a good law firm but it certainly a shell of its old self, down now to three lawyers. You can't help but wonder what Lord & Whip themselves - who founded the firm 104 years ago - would think of this and, for me, I start think about the demise of my law firm which I hope happens long after I'm gone.

You can read my original post here which has a link to the Complaint that was filed in Baltimore City Circuit Court.

You can find the names of the parties involved by reading the Complaint or going to the Daily Record article. My general rule is that nothing is served by naming names. These folks had their little battle and the final score will preserved online for all time. Just not on my blog because these people are not public figures that should have their professional battles played out of the public. I realize every media outlet does this but I think it the wrong play. Because in situations like this, you never really know who the real good guys and bad guys are even if you did, you would understand the history of what happened.

So let's hope the go all Ari Gold on us and they hug it out. Either way, let's let this story go quietly.